The Metropolitan Museum of Art Metropolitan Kouros Essay Example

The Metropolitan Museum of Art: Metropolitan Kouros Essay Alex Skolnik November 23, 2013 Art History Outline Title of the piece: Metropolitan Kouros Date: 600-590 BCE Medium: Naxian Marble Dimensions: Heigh 64 5/8 Meseum location: The Metropolitan Meseum of Art 2) This free standing sculpture shows signs of egyptian influence on Greek art. The pose has one foot standing forward while one is behind, the arms rest at the side with supports attatched to the tehighs, and the face shows no emotion and the eyes seem to have no pupils. The peice is very symmetrical with no real variation of body shape. The hair is shown in a knot like pattern with a narrow ribben holding it back. The mouth is shown in a form known as the Archaic smile. The difference between this and egyptian scultptures is that this scultpure is nude, where as the egyptian men were clothed. 3) Contextual Analysis This piece was found in Attica, Greece and it depicts a young Greek child, being one of the earliest freestanding marble statues from Attica. These Kouroi were belived to have served as grave markers. The Greek sculptures that were influenced by the egyptians were made within the Archaic period of the greek society. and hile they look really un lifelike to us they represent a lifelike vitality and a concern with design to the greek society. It is believed that these sculptures were painted to have a skin like tone, with detailed hair, eyes, and lips. The creator of this peice is unknown as were most artists during the Archaic era. The anatomy on this piece was spot on, using forumulas from egyptian sculpt ures. The Kouroi was thought to depict the god apollo, but it was later found out that, that was not the case. The functions of these sculptures vary from region to region from being a grave marker, to a votive tatue, or ever a cult statue. We will write a custom essay sample on The Metropolitan Museum of Art: Metropolitan Kouros specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on The Metropolitan Museum of Art: Metropolitan Kouros specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on The Metropolitan Museum of Art: Metropolitan Kouros specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer With no written records and the piece being ripped from the archealogical site there is no certain date, location or reason that we know. Kouroi means young boy and these fgures are always shown with no facial hair, and are mostly life size, if not larger. 4) This piece was concieved around 600 590 BCE although there is no certainty in the time perloa or locatlon, It Is Known tnat tnls was developed In tne Arcnalc perloa that these are used for Grave Markers, Votivs, or statues. The piece has strong influence from egyptian scultptures and is a very influential piece in Greek history.

The nature of God

The nature of God Running Head:  »Ã‚ ¿THE NATURE OF GOD 1 »Ã‚ ¿ THE NATURE OF GOD: 5 »Ã‚ ¿ The nature of GodName:Institution: »Ã‚ ¿ The nature of GodThe factual nature of God (given that He exists as the First Cause) is at all times argued by most Christians. Moreover, numerous questions arise on the nature of God. All human beings will actually die at some point; yet, we consistently decline the reasons within us that glance into the factual result of a person's death. For humankind, it may be far simpler to agree that, they will depart to a "secure home" in Heaven and will be pardoned all their sins by a supreme being. Fortuitously, some people usually query this existence and the development of humankind; in addition to, the spiritual lessons obtained from our mothers and fathers, community and religion. This essay investigates the two logical justifications for and against the nature of God; in accordance to opinions of some exceptional researchers and philosophers.Anselm of Canterbury was the first to attempt an o...Through two classical arguments for God; the ontological argument and the teleological argument, this paper will show that there is no adequate evidence or extensive justifications for the true nature of God.According to the ontological argument, God usually represents one sacred and all-powerful being, the heavenly oneness of greatest truth and spiritual benefits. St. Anselm of Canterbury designed the ontological argument by stating that, even a dupe can comprehend or appreciate the perception of an omnipotent being of which nothing better may be formed (Palmer, 2013). Saint Anselm constantly stated that a dupe articulates the nature of this being only in his brain and thoughts other than in veracity. With declarations such as perfect, all-powerful and supernatural built in this being's definition, it seems impossible to argue against it. Nonetheless, the theists could prove the nature...